Author
Abstract
This articleexamines the concept of smart cities as an ideological construct, i.e., not only as a set of technological solutions, but also as a normative system of ideas, values, and power dynamics. The aim of the study is to reveal the principles underlying the vision of a smart city, who creates and implements it, and what critical tensions emerge in the scientific literature. The study was conducted using qualitative analysis of scientific literature based on publications in the Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) journal. The articles analysed are systematised according to four directions: (1) the origin and notion of a smart city, (2) ideas and values, (3) creators and actors, and (4) criticism. The research shows that the smart city has evolved by combining the paradigms of digitization, sustainability, good governance, and citizen engagement. The SCRD journal literature highlights the core values of smart cities: transparency, openness, social inclusion, human rights, equality, environmental protection, improvement of quality of life, and urban efficiency. It has also been found that the smart city as an ideological construct is collectively created and supported by three main groups of actors: residents, local government, and the private sector. However,critically-minded literature reveals significant risks: cybersecurity vulnerabilities, the expansion of surveillance and control, the impact of disinformation, and the deepening of social and regional divisions. The article concludes that the smart city should be analyzed not only as a model of technological progress but also as an ideological construct with political, social, and democratic consequences.
Suggested Citation
Eugenijus KRIKŠČIŪNAS, 2026.
"The concept of the smart city as an ideological construct: an analysis of SCRD journal publications,"
Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 10(3), pages 7-19, july.
Handle:
RePEc:pop:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:7-19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25019/t25fey19
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:7-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.