IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Des Considérations Critiques Concernantla Décision De La Cour Constitutionnelle No. 832/2021


  • Roxana TRUTA

    (Avocat, Barreau Mures, Doctorant, Universite de l'Ouest de Timisoara-Faculte de Droit; ROUMANIE.)

  • Claudia ROSU

    (Prof. Univ. Dr. Habil. Universite de l'Ouest de Timisoara-Faculte de Droit; ROUMANIE.)


Ce document attire l'attention sur la décision de la Cour Constitutionnelle no. 832/2021 concernant l'exception d'inconstitutionnalité de la phrase "exactement et littéralement" des dispositions de l'art. 323 par. 1 du Code de procédure civile. Les auteurs y apportent un regard critique, analysant en détail les arguments avancés par la Cour Constitutionnelle qui ont conduit à l'admission de l'exception d'inconstitutionnalité. Dans le même temps, cet article analyse dans quelle mesure l'argument de la Cour Constitutionnelle concernant la charge des tribunaux est susceptible d'influencer le respect des principes fondamentaux qui régissent la procédure civile

Suggested Citation

  • Roxana TRUTA & Claudia ROSU, 2022. "Des Considérations Critiques Concernantla Décision De La Cour Constitutionnelle No. 832/2021," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 91, pages 49-61, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:91:y:2022:p:49-61

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    exception d'inconstitutionnalité; enregistrement des témoignages; exactement et littéralement; des critiques; Cour Constitutionnelle.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
    • K15 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Civil Law; Common Law


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:91:y:2022:p:49-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.