IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v78y2019p84-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preliminary Chamber - A Solution For The Celerity Of Criminal Trials?

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Mihaela COMAN

    (Lecturer, PhD. George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology Tg. Mures, lawyer- Mures Bar, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of the celerity of the criminal trial, from the perspective of the institution of preliminary chamber, seen by the legislator as a solution for delaying the resolution of cases. Although this was the initial purpose for introducing this filter-stage, the judicial practice shows that, for the most part, the preliminary chamber does not solve, and even hinders, this problem of celerity. The paper deals with the problem of the impossibility of eliminating this stage, of the deadline in which the case is resolved in the preliminary chamber, as well as the possibility of sending the case back to the prosecutor's office even after the trial begins.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Mihaela COMAN, 2019. "Preliminary Chamber - A Solution For The Celerity Of Criminal Trials?," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 78, pages 84-89, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:78:y:2019:p:84-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj19/recjurid193_8F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    preliminary chamber; fair trial; celerity of trial; sending back the case.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:78:y:2019:p:84-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.