IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v75y2018p81-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Romanian Administrative Code Between Necessity And Controversies

Author

Listed:
  • Ximena MOLDOVAN

    (Assistant Professor Phd. Faculty of Law and Economics, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

The official objective of the Romanian Administrative Code was to unify the legislation in the field of public administration. The idea of such a legislative codification was born in 2001, but the draft of the normative act which is the Romanian Administrative Code was introduced in public debate only in November 2016. The fact that there have been several general parliamentary elections along this lengthy debate, has led to a series of changes to this draft law that call into question the ultimate goal of this codification, ending with the declaration of the non-constitutionality of the normative act draft.

Suggested Citation

  • Ximena MOLDOVAN, 2018. "The Romanian Administrative Code Between Necessity And Controversies," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 75, pages 81-87, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:75:y:2018:p:81-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj18/recjurid184_7F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative code; legislation; public administration; unification.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:75:y:2018:p:81-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.