IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v74y2018p80-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Practical Examination Of The Use Of Evidence Before Magistrates Of The Preliminary Chamber

Author

Listed:
  • Lucian CHIRIAC

    (Professor PhD, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology Tirgu Mures, ROMANIA)

Abstract

The Romanian Constitutional Court ruled through two decisions, nr.641 of 11 November 2014 and nr.802 of 5 December 2017, accepting the hypothesis in which any means of evidence is acceptable during the phase of the preliminary chamber hearing, and, we would add, not only to verify the legality of administrating evidence during the criminal indictment. It is our opinion that the preliminary chamber must constitute a bastion of verifying the necessary evidence for establishing the truth in a trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucian CHIRIAC, 2018. "A Practical Examination Of The Use Of Evidence Before Magistrates Of The Preliminary Chamber," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 74, pages 80-87, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:74:y:2018:p:80-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj18/recjurid183_9F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    preliminary chamber; preliminary judgment; preliminary hearing; evidence; proof; discovery; Constitutional Court; legality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:74:y:2018:p:80-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.