IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v74y2018p75-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La Non-Participation Du Procureur Competent – Aspects Theoriques Et Pratiques, Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos CHILEA

    (Professeur, PhD. University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology Tirgu Mures, ROMANIA.)

  • Elena Alina LUNGU

    (Avocat dans le cadre du Barreau de Constanta, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

Quand la participation du procureur au jugement des causes est obligatoire, son absence ou la participation d'un procureur incompétent entraîne la nullité absolue de la décision rendue dans le dossier. Le procureur est obligé de vérifier sa propre compétence et participer seulement dans les causes ou l'acte introductif d'instance a été réalisée par le parquet spécialisé dont il fait partie, selon le cas il peut s’agir d'un parquet "normal" ou les parquets spécialisés DIICOT ou DNA. Le respect de ces obligations concernant la participation et compétence du procureur pour instruire des cas liés aux certaines infractions spécialisées (crime organisée pour la DIICOT ou corruption pour la DNA respectivement) représente le respect incontournable du droit a un proces équitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos CHILEA & Elena Alina LUNGU, 2018. "La Non-Participation Du Procureur Competent – Aspects Theoriques Et Pratiques, Consequences," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 74, pages 75-79, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:74:y:2018:p:75-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj18/recjurid183_8F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    procureur; non-participation; compétence; nullité;

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:74:y:2018:p:75-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.