IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v72y2018p88-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robotics, Rights And Liabilities Juridical Prospects Of Intelligent Machines

Author

Listed:
  • Pasquale Luigi DI VIGGIANO

    (PhD. Professor in Sociology of Electronic Communication at University of Rome Unitelma Sapienza and Professor of Legal Informatics at the School of Specialization for Legal Professionals, Salento University.. Deputy Director of the Center for Risk Studies (CSR) and Component of the Scientific Council of the Laboratory of e-Government (LEG) - University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. Member of the Scientific Council of the IRIA Observatory (Internet of Things, Robotics and Artificial Intelligence), National School of Digital Administration, Unitelma Sapienza of Rome, Italy.)

Abstract

The idea that automated machines, that is the automata, could somehow imitate and in some cases replace human activity, found fertile ground in the literature of all time. At the same time, science, in a wide sense, was fascinated by the same suggestions, finding stimuli to deal with areas traditionally assigned to science fiction. From the last decades of the last century, with the emergence and evolution of electronic computing and with the development of digital planning through the production and the increasingly performing use of powerful algorithms, the robotics from the field of science fiction passed systematically to be of interest not only of the theoretical and applied research, but also of economics, law and the thus defined social systems. Positive law, understood as a deontic rule, until recently has maintained a certain distance from automation issues, dealing solely with normative responsibility and possible damages arising from the production, trade and use of automated or technological machines, including computer devices and their necessary software. Indeed, in the Italian legal system the issue is dealt with in different ways for what regards the attribution of liability, because there is no specific legal rule for intelligent machines. Here some questions rise that are closely related to the evolution of learning machines. At European level, the matter is currently covered by EU Product Law and the Machinery Directive. The European Parliament's resolution of 16 February 2017 on recommendations to the Commission on civil-law rules on robotics, indicates on the one hand that no time must be lost to legally regulate the use of robots both in industrial activities and in private life , while on the other hand it has opened a new chapter on robotics, by placing it directly in a European legal order called to legislate (de jure condendum) on essential profiles to see to what extent robotic actions affect human rights, provoking non predictable effects. On this basis, Parliament calls the Commission to adopt one or more legislative proposals on this matter, indicating the need to address liability issues as a core issue. The legal aspects referred to concern robot rights and the reflection on the legalization of a new legal personality: the electronic person. The areas particularly affected by robotics are eHealth, Communication, Transport, Public Administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasquale Luigi DI VIGGIANO, 2018. "Robotics, Rights And Liabilities Juridical Prospects Of Intelligent Machines," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 72, pages 88-103, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:88-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj18/recjurid181_7F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Legal informatics; eHealth; Civil rights of Robots; IoT; Robot Work; Liability.;

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:88-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.