IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v67y2016p77-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justice And Democracy Defeated By Human Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos CHILEA

    (Prof. univ. dr. ”Petru Maior” University of Tirgu Mures, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, Tirgu Mures, Lawyer Constanta Bar, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Justice, Majority principle and Human Rights, a triangle designed to get you mentation about ideas in politics and how they matter, and what happens when we put option political theory to study on pressing real-macrocosm event and dilemmas. The author will explore the three core concept through debates. The relationship between commonwealth and human rights is intricate, symbiotic and mutually constitutive. A rights based approach to democracy grounded in the rule of legal philosophy is considered increasingly the most consistent safe-conduct against human rights abuses. This presentation will greet invocations of justice, democracy and human being rightfulness with a new oddment and a sharpened critical eye. From obiter dictum that a individual 's fundamental rightfulness stop where another's rights begin to show how democratic justice cannot prevent or punish those who violate human rights by invoking their rights to life, impropriety and civilization, as well as the rights to crime syndicate and religion. Succesful democratic governance should definitly dressed are on promotion and security of man right and fundamental freedoms. For without this assurance there can be no democracy in any important sense. Democracy can’t be characterized without man rights. Human rights can be ensured viably only in a democratic state. A functional democracy that wooing differing qualities, improvement correspondence and ensures singular chance is progressively turning into the best bet against the concentration of power in the hands of a few and the abuse of human rights that inevitably effect from it. Thusly, the best assurance of human right exudes from a feasible majority rule social structure grounded in the rule of law. Succesful democratic governance should definitly concentrate on advancement and security of human rights and fundamental freedoms. For without this assurance there can be no democracy in any important sense. Democracy can’t be characterized without human rights. Human rights can be ensured viably only in a democratic state. A functional democracy that suits differing qualities, advances correspondence and ensures singular opportunities is progressively turning into the best bet against the concentration of power in the hands of a few and the abuse of human rights that inevitably results from it. Thusly, the best assurance of human right exudes from a feasible majority rule structure grounded in the rule of law.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos CHILEA, 2016. "Justice And Democracy Defeated By Human Rights," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 67, pages 77-84, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:67:y:2016:p:77-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj16/recjurid164_5F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:13-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:pmu:cjurid:v:71:y:2017:p:52-65 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:pmu:cjurid:v:71:y:2017:p:153-165 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Protection of human rights; functional democracy; democratic justice; safeguarding human right abuses;

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:67:y:2016:p:77-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.