IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v63y2015p74-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Defence Counsel’S Ethics In Plea Bargaining:Losing Sight Of The Innocent?

Author

Listed:
  • Lisanne O. MAURICE

    (Defence Counsel,Lecturer at the Université de Moncton, Moncton, N.B. CANADA.)

Abstract

The vast majority of accused who appear before a criminal court in Canada will not proceed to trial and most of those will plead guilty to some offence. This means that a substantial portion of a defence lawyer’s cases will be resolved. Sometimes this will occur after months or years of negotiation, sometimes on the court-house steps, but all will involve some form of discussion between Crown and defence. These negotiations have commonly been referred to, by the public and participants in the criminal justice system alike, as "plea bargaining". Plea bargaining is now an accepted and integral part of our criminal justice system. The process involves an exchange of information between Crown counsel and defence counsel about the strengths and weaknesses of their respective cases and the circumstances of the offence and of the offender. Experienced Crown and defence counsel use this opportunity to ensure that individual justice is done. Through this process, an accused will surrender his right to trial, with its accompanying procedural safeguards, in exchange for concessions aimed at sentence reduction and certainty. For some, the term plea bargaining implies that justice is a commodity that can be bought, sold and bartered and thus negative connotations have resulted. It also inaccurately assumes that plea bargaining relates solely to agreements concerning guilty pleas. Discussions between counsels frequently include a vast array of considerations, much more than negotiated guilty pleas, and sometimes do not, in fact, result in guilty pleas at all . Whether this practice is a blight or a blessing on the criminal justice system has been much debated . Due to its strong focus on efficiency and its resemblance to an "assembly-line conveyor belt" , plea bargaining can be linked to what the American scholar Herbert Packer defined as a crime control model of justice whereby "the criminal justice process is controlled by prosecutors, with the primary aim being a stream-lined guilty plea". The defence counsel’s role is nonetheless very important in ensuring that the innocent accused does not get "caught" in what could be seen as a criminal factory, especially if the accused decides to "cut their losses" and plead guilty. In this way, defence counsel has a duty to protect the innocent accused’s rights and circumvent this incremental descent into poor judgment, not forgetting the image of the criminal justice system itself. What is the defence counsel’s ethics in this process? The main focus of this essay will be on the ethical considerations for defence counsel when engaging in plea bargaining, in the subset of resolution discussions, the negotiated guilty plea, while keeping in mind the risk of wrongful conviction. This essay will show that, to the exception of the Canadian Bar Association Model Code of Professional Conduct, there is little guidance on ethics in the plea bargaining process.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisanne O. MAURICE, 2015. "The Defence Counsel’S Ethics In Plea Bargaining:Losing Sight Of The Innocent?," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 63, pages 74-97, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:63:y:2015:p:74-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj15/recjurid154_6F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the defence; counsel; ethics; plea bargaining;

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:63:y:2015:p:74-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.