IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v59y2014p237-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections On Practice Of Pre-Trial Detention

Author

Listed:
  • Krisztian SZABO

    (Assistant Professor, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Law, Attorney, HUNGARY.)

Abstract

The Hungarian criminal procedural law practice is far from the norms at several points, unfortunately, the juristic acts of the European Union, the European Court of Human Rights practices and the Constitutional Court's decree make just as little influence on fixed schematic thinking and decision-making as the Explanation of the Criminal Procedure Act (Holé & Kadlót 2007) and the ad hoc decisions of the Mansion. It is more devastating in the cases of pre-trial detention related procedures, whether it relates to the enactment or the reservation, for the enforcement of the right to effective protection is strongly questionable nowadays. In this treatise - including but not limited to – I am trying to analyze a few parts of this issue, however, they definitely belong to the most frequently encountered problems in Hungary. Changes are not experienced across the equality of arms, or the enforcement of the effective defense in the entrenched practice of criminal procedures, despite the fact the need, reasonableness now can be seen brighter than the sun.

Suggested Citation

  • Krisztian SZABO, 2014. "Reflections On Practice Of Pre-Trial Detention," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 59, pages 237-245, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:59:y:2014:p:237-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj14/recjurid144_17F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pre-trial detention; practice; right to effective protection; coercive measure; Hungarian criminal procedural law;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:59:y:2014:p:237-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.