IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v56y2013p13-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supremacy Of European Law And Possible Judicial Remedies In Regard To The Issue Of Romania’S Accession To The Schengen Area

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolae PLOESTEANU

    (Associate Professor, PhD, Petru Maior University, Tirgu-Mures, ROMANIA.)

  • Raul MIRON

    (Student, Petru Maior University, Tirgu-Mures, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

The paper is intended to serve as a study of the present and most recent issues regarding the viability, applicability and consequences of enforceability of the principle of Supremacy of European Law. While the doctrine is not novel, certain measures taken by European and National authorities have shaped and altered this doctrine and have generated interesting legal issues. In this respect, the paper will focus on: (i) firstly, identifying and describing the basis, general concept and effects of embracing this doctrine; and (ii) secondly, bringing forward specific national and international issues of this doctrine in respect of Romania’s accession to the Schengen Area. In relation to this subject, with the aim of enhancing the overall knowledge of this topic, the authors analysed the issue in light of the judicial remedies available to Romania in the context of the manifested opposition of some European states that lead to the failure of the accession process of Romania to the Schengen Area.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae PLOESTEANU & Raul MIRON, 2014. "Supremacy Of European Law And Possible Judicial Remedies In Regard To The Issue Of Romania’S Accession To The Schengen Area," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 56, pages 13-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:56:y:2013:p:13-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj14/recjurid141_1F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Supremacy of European Law; Schengen Area; accession; responsibility; European Court of Justice.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:56:y:2013:p:13-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.