IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v46y2011p60-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections Regarding The Prejudice And The Way Of Materialization In The Case Of Human Trafficking Crimes

Author

Listed:
  • Nelu Dorinel POPA

    (Lecturer, PhD., "Petru Maior" University of Tirgu Mures, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Crimes of trafficking in human beings is the object of many internal and international regulations, also representing one of the new manifestation modes of the transnational organized crime. What is prejudiced by such a crime is the human person, considered both in it’s material and spiritual nature. Being a complex offense, trafficking in human beings has raised many controversies about establishing a proper legal classification of such facts, also being a source of contradictions in the judicial practice, reason for which they were raised a few examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelu Dorinel POPA, 2011. "Reflections Regarding The Prejudice And The Way Of Materialization In The Case Of Human Trafficking Crimes," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 46, pages 60-69, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:46:y:2011:p:60-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj11/recjurid113_5F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trafficking in human beings; constraint; consent person; material object; harm; minors; human liberty.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics
    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:46:y:2011:p:60-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.