IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Efficiency Of The Legal Provisions In The Area Of Corruption Crimes Punishment Through A Criminal Policy Perspective (I)

Listed author(s):
  • Olimpiu A. SABÃU-POP

    (Notaire public ; PhD. , Université "Petru Maior" de Tîrgu-Mureș, ROMANIA)

Registered author(s):

    The level of actual delinquency (the total amount of crimes committed in a given period of time), including the black figure of delinquency (the total amount of crimes that are not discovered), is considerably higher compared to the legal delinquency (the crimes that are discovered and judged). This reality is due not only to the skillfulness of the perpetrators, but, mostly, represents a consequence of the victims’ passivity or, to be more precise, of the lack of an apparent victim (both the briber and the person that is bribed have no reasons to inform the judiciary bodies). A series of practical difficulties are approached, come across by the Romanian judges in the process of solving high level corruption cases, the appropriate punishments as well as the preventive role of these and the general impact that corruption has upon the justice system in Romania

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

    Volume (Year): 44 (2011)
    Issue (Month): (March)
    Pages: 123-129

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:44:y:2011:p:123-129
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:44:y:2011:p:123-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.