IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Competence Of The Constitutional Court Of Romania To Settle The Constitutional Conflicts Between The Public Authorities

Listed author(s):
  • Daniela Cristina VALEA

    (Lecturer, PhD. “Petru Maior” University of Tîrgu-Mureº, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, ROMANIA)

The competence of the Constitutional Court of Romania to settle constitutional conflicts between public authorities has generated and is still generating numerous debates and analyses due to both theoretical as well as practical implications. Although initially such an attribute was considered for the Constitutional Court of Romania, finally it was not included in the competence area of the constitutional jurisdictional authority as regulated by the 1991 Romanian Constitution. However, it seems that such a competence for a constitutional court is required for a balanced functioning of a relatively “young” democratic system; consequently, starting with 2003 we find it among the attributes of this body. This paper approaches several aspects related to the application of this attribute and the implied consequences.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

Volume (Year): 42 (2010)
Issue (Month): (September)
Pages: 95-102

in new window

Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:42:y:2010:p:95-102
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:42:y:2010:p:95-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.