The moral prejudice by “back bounce
The admission of this principle was for long a controversial aspect in the Romanian and French doctrine that didn’t accept the recovery for this prejudice. It was accepted only the recovery from the prejudice suffered by the direct victim, because the acceptance of the recovery from the moral prejudice by back bounce was regarded as being against morals and against the principle that the prejudice must be fully recovered and only one time. Accordingly only the direct victim could get compensation for the suffered prejudice, the indirect victims being regarded as persons that are trying to abuse the legal system for getting undeserving benefits, as well as immoral because they use someone else’s suffering.
Volume (Year): 20-21 (2005)
Issue (Month): (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/Email: |
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:20-21:y:2005:p:120-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.