IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pwat00/0000623.html

Toward reliable water resource assessment: Correcting bias in satellite-based rainfall and model-derived discharge in Kenya’s Central Highlands

Author

Listed:
  • Felicia Yeboah
  • Afua Owusu
  • Mansoor Leh
  • Komlavi Akpoti
  • Kirubel Mekonnen
  • Elias Muluken Adamseged
  • Emma Odera
  • Naga Velpuri

Abstract

Reliable precipitation and streamflow data are essential for hydrological modelling and water resources management, yet observational networks in many African regions remain sparse. This study evaluated five satellite precipitation products (SPPs) CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-PDIR, TAMSAT, and MSWEP and modelled stream-discharge data from VegET–mizuRoute model against in situ observations across the Central Highlands of Kenya for 2012–2021. Performance was assessed at eight precipitation and six discharge stations using pairwise statistics (RMSE, NSE, CC, RMB) and categorical metrics (POD, FAR) on a monthly scale. Four bias correction techniques (Least Squares, Quantile Mapping, Delta Method, Random Forest) were assessed to enhance the utility of the best-performing SPP and the modelled discharge data. CHIRPS and MSWEP consistently outperformed the other products: CHIRPS achieved RMSE of 34.85–134.26 mm, NSE of −0.94 to 0.44, and CC of 0.52–0.87, while MSWEP recorded RMSE of 24.17–125.66 mm, NSE of −0.91 to 0.65, and CC of 0.45–0.84. The VegET–mizuRoute model reproduced seasonal flow dynamics but showed station-dependent biases, with NSE from −2.28 to 0.23, RMB from −0.59 to 0.77, and CC from 0.46 to 0.71. Following bias correction, Random Forest yielded substantial improvements for both precipitation and discharge, underscoring the capacity of machine learning to address complex, nonlinear biases. It raised precipitation NSE to a consistently positive 0.85–0.95 across all eight stations while halving RMSE at most sites (9.05–46.23 mm). For discharge, Random Forest improved NSE at most stations to 0.80–0.88, with CC rising to 0.92–0.95, except at one station. Our findings confirm that systematic bias remains a dominant error source in global hydrological products in this region, and that machine learning-based bias correction is essential for the operational reliability and accuracy of these datasets for water management and flood applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Felicia Yeboah & Afua Owusu & Mansoor Leh & Komlavi Akpoti & Kirubel Mekonnen & Elias Muluken Adamseged & Emma Odera & Naga Velpuri, 2026. "Toward reliable water resource assessment: Correcting bias in satellite-based rainfall and model-derived discharge in Kenya’s Central Highlands," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-38, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000623
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000623
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000623&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: water (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/water .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.