IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pwat00/0000498.html

Fluid data: The problem of accurately estimating household access to water and sanitation in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen P Gasteyer
  • Kimberly Slinde Lemme
  • Autumn Bland

Abstract

Recent high-profile crises have disrupted the myth of universal access to potable water and sanitation in the United States. According to the Joint Monitoring Project on access to Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (JMP), more than 99% of the population have unfettered access to water services [1]. Reports and scholarly papers, however, show higher numbers lacking potable water and/or sanitation services – specifically in places with high percentages of historically marginalized populations. Mainstream media, politicians, and agency functionaries generally voice support for addressing the issue. Still, sustainable programs, policy development, and activism have been hampered by a lack of data that accurately depicts the problem. In this essay we analyze the currently available data collection systems estimating water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) access in the United States – in databases located across multiple government agencies to measure different policy objectives, and at different temporal and geographic scales. This leads to rather disparate estimates of the scope and magnitude of the problem and creates an information landscape that is difficult to navigate for those focused on improving conditions. We discuss new initiatives (specifically portals and dashboards) that aim to improve data availability, accuracy, and visualization to drive better policies, programs, and actions toward closing the WaSH gap in the United States. These are important steps for improving data about access to potable water and functional sanitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen P Gasteyer & Kimberly Slinde Lemme & Autumn Bland, 2026. "Fluid data: The problem of accurately estimating household access to water and sanitation in the United States," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000498
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000498&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: water (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/water .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.