IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pwat00/0000402.html

Quantifying lead (Pb) leaching from galvanized handpump spouts, leaded brass taps, and stainless-steel alternatives using the NSF 61 test protocol: Implications for safe rural water supply

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle Rezek
  • Michael Fisher
  • Timothy Purvis
  • Aaron Salzberg
  • Solomon Minyila
  • Siddhartha Roy

Abstract

Lead (Pb) is a neurotoxin with no known safe level of exposure. Widespread lead contamination has been reported in rural groundwater-supplied drinking water systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), primarily arising from the corrosion of lead-containing plumbing materials such as galvanized steel and leaded brass. The National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) 372 standard certifies drinking water system components as “lead-free” when the lead content is below 0.25% by weight for wetted surfaces. NSF 61 standard, in contrast, certifies the safety of “endpoint” drinking water system components based on their potential to leach chemical contaminants, including lead. This study evaluates the lead content (NSF 372) and lead leaching behavior (NSF 61) of plumbing components commonly used in LMIC rural community water systems to determine their suitability for delivering safe drinking water. Galvanized borehole handpump tanks (specifically, spouts) and brass taps widely used in Ghana and other LMICs were tested alongside stainless-steel alternatives and lead-free PVC pipe controls against NSF 61 and NSF 372 standards. Stainless-steel components and PVC controls met both standards, whereas galvanized steel spouts and leaded brass taps did not. Average water lead levels leached over the 19-day experimental period were 192 µg/L (SD = 89) for leaded brass taps, 34 µg/L (SD = 3) for galvanized steel spouts, 0.4 µg/L (SD = 0.1) for stainless-steel taps, 0.3 µg/L (SD = 0.3) for PVC pipes, and below the detection limit (0.5 µg/L) for stainless-steel spouts. These findings indicate that lead-containing galvanized steel and leaded brass components that exceed NSF 372 and/or NSF 61 standards pose a significant health risk and should not be used in potable water systems. Lead-free alternatives that meet NSF 372 and NSF 61 standards, such as stainless steel, are strongly recommended for safer rural water infrastructure due to their minimal lead-leaching risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle Rezek & Michael Fisher & Timothy Purvis & Aaron Salzberg & Solomon Minyila & Siddhartha Roy, 2026. "Quantifying lead (Pb) leaching from galvanized handpump spouts, leaded brass taps, and stainless-steel alternatives using the NSF 61 test protocol: Implications for safe rural water supply," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000402
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000402&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: water (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/water .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.