IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pwat00/0000317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness-to-pay and demand for sanitation products in rural northern Ghana: Impacts of seasonality and methodology

Author

Listed:
  • John Trimmer
  • Joyce Kisiangani
  • Bessy Ewoenam Odame-Boafo
  • Stanley Bortse Sam
  • Chloé Poulin
  • Dominic Osei
  • Valerie Bauza

Abstract

Open defecation practices persist in some resource-limited contexts, such as rural northern Ghana, where poverty and environmental conditions can make appropriate sanitation infrastructure unaffordable. This study assessed household willingness-to-pay (WTP) for sanitation products in 146 communities across four regions of northern Ghana. Sanitation products included the Digni-Loo slab, a locally marketed plastic latrine slab, and four full toilet facilities (Digni-Loo Toilet, Sato Toilet, BioFill Toilet, Water Closet), each including a slab, superstructure, and durable substructure suitable for local soils. During harvest and non-harvest seasons, we measured revealed WTP for the Digni-Loo slab using Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auctions, where households bid money to purchase the product (N = 587 unique households). We measured stated WTP for all sanitation products using contingent valuation, where households report what they would pay without making a real purchase (N = 638 households). We found WTP levels far below all sanitation products’ actual costs, suggesting a need for subsidies. Revealed WTP for the Digni-Loo slab during harvest season averaged 191 GHS (17 USD; 14% of cost) and was slightly lower during non-harvest season (171 GHS; 16 USD). Revealed WTP also tended to be higher in rural small towns than in more remote communities. Households’ stated WTP typically overestimated their revealed WTP for the Digni-Loo slab, with revealed WTP averaging 53–77% of stated WTP. Stated WTP was especially high during non-harvest season, averaging 419 GHS (38 USD) or 30% of cost. During harvest season, stated WTP averaged 295 GHS (27 USD) and was more consistent with revealed WTP, suggesting agricultural households were better able to predict purchasing behavior when more funds were available. Stated WTP for other toilet facilities ranged between 11–31% of their cost. Overall, findings from this work can inform regional efforts toward sanitation promotion, while also providing broader insight into sanitation demand seasonality and relationships between stated and revealed WTP.

Suggested Citation

  • John Trimmer & Joyce Kisiangani & Bessy Ewoenam Odame-Boafo & Stanley Bortse Sam & Chloé Poulin & Dominic Osei & Valerie Bauza, 2025. "Willingness-to-pay and demand for sanitation products in rural northern Ghana: Impacts of seasonality and methodology," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000317
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000317
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000317&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: water (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/water .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.