IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000238.html

Institutional and systemic barriers: Towards a sustainable transformation of soybean contract farming in Northwestern Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Getahun Abreham
  • Zemen Ayalew
  • Essa Chanie Mussa
  • Mammo Muchie
  • Marelign Adugna

Abstract

Soybean contract farming is increasingly encouraged for agricultural sustainability and transformation, and improved smallholder welfare in Ethiopia. Despite the contemporary significance and economic advantages of soybeans for farmers, current yields consistently fall short of their potential, and local sources struggle to meet growing demand. This research investigates the institutional and systemic constraints of the soybean contract in Metema, West Armachio, and Quara districts. Previous studies usually use a reductionist approach, investigating isolated factors and thus failing to explore the multifaceted interdependent nature of these farming systems. To address existing knowledge and methodological gaps, this research employs an inclusive, multilevel analytical apprpach within a transaction cost theoretical framework, utilizing a cross-sectional design. A multi-stage sampling procedure is employed to collect data from 369 smallholder farmers, comprising 170 contract farming participants and 199 non-participants. The bivariate Tobit model findings confirm that poor seed quality, lack of enforceability, low contract price, and limited market power are critical systemic constraints of soybean contract farming in the study areas. To address the problems, the responsible bodies should resolve oligopsony market issues by strengthening farmers’ multi-purpose cooperatives and employing anti-collusion measures to ensure market fairness. Policymakers must establish a clear legal framework that mandates strict contract enforceability, competitive pricing, and the use of collateral requirements to build farmer trust. Finally, securing good-quality inputs from certified suppliers through a fair contract model is crucial to promote sustainable growth and structural transformation within Ethiopian agriculture.Author summary: Despite its economic value, the productivity of soybeans in Ethiopia lags significantly behind global standards, imposing a heavy fiscal burden due to expensive edible vegetable oil imports. To resolve this, the government has encouraged contract farming (CF) as a strategic instrument to link smallholder soybean producers with reliable markets. However, a productivity paradox continues where high market demand occurs, yet local soybean yields and producers’ satisfaction remain low. This research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with a bivariate Tobit econometric approach, to explore the systemic constraints influencing smallholder farmers in northwestern Ethiopia. The study found that soybean contract farming success is eroded by critical systemic problems: lack of legal contract enforcement, poor seed quality, and the occurrence of oligopsony, in which illegal buyer groups manipulate smallholders through biased pricing. The findings revealed that while specific training can increase soybean yields, the true sustainability and development depend on the supply of certified seeds, competitive pricing, and transparency. To empower local farmers and ensure food security, this study recommends immediate policy interventions to formalize the seed supply system, strengthen legal protections for agreements, and regulate market brokers.

Suggested Citation

  • Getahun Abreham & Zemen Ayalew & Essa Chanie Mussa & Mammo Muchie & Marelign Adugna, 2026. "Institutional and systemic barriers: Towards a sustainable transformation of soybean contract farming in Northwestern Ethiopia," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000238
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000238&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. D. Stanley & Stephen B. Jarrell, 2005. "Meta‐Regression Analysis: A Quantitative Method of Literature Surveys," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 299-308, July.
    2. repec:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:353-378. is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fidrmuc, Jarko & Lind, Ronja, 2020. "Macroeconomic impact of Basel III: Evidence from a meta-analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Melo, Patricia C. & Graham, Daniel J. & Noland, Robert B., 2009. "A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 332-342, May.
    3. Labandeira, Xavier & Labeaga, José M. & López-Otero, Xiral, 2017. "A meta-analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 549-568.
    4. Meiyu Wang & Ping Fu & Yonghua Yin & Miao He & Yu Liu, 2016. "Acute, Recent and Past HEV Infection among Voluntary Blood Donors in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Stanley, T. D. & Doucouliagos, Chris, 2019. "Practical Significance, Meta-Analysis and the Credibility of Economics," IZA Discussion Papers 12458, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Maurizio La Rocca & Fabiola Montalto & Tiziana La Rocca & Raffaele Staglianò, 2017. "The effect of ownership on firm value: a meta-analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2324-2353.
    7. Tomáš Havránek & Jana Sedlaříková, 2014. "Meta-analýza důchodové elasticity poptávky po penězích [A Meta-Analysis of the Income Elasticity of Money Demand]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 366-382.
    8. Klomp, Jeroen, 2023. "Political budget cycles in military expenditures: A meta-analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1083-1102.
    9. Christopher Snyder & Ran Zhuo, 2018. "Sniff Tests as a Screen in the Publication Process: Throwing out the Wheat with the Chaff," NBER Working Papers 25058, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Francisco Javier Blanco-Encomienda & Rocío García-Cantero & María José Latorre-Medina, 2020. "Association between Work-Related Rumination, Work Environment and Employee Well-Being: A Meta-Analytic Study of Main and Moderator Effects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 887-910, August.
    11. Sebastian Gechert, 2015. "What fiscal policy is most effective? A meta-regression analysis," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 67(3), pages 553-580.
    12. Yannick Bineau, 2010. "Une méta-analyse des études sur la mesure de la mobilité internationale du capital selon la méthode de Feldstein et Horioka," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 86(2), pages 227-272.
    13. Neves, Pedro Cunha & Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Diana & Sochirca, Elena, 2021. "The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 196-209.
    14. Avinash & T. Mallikarjunappa, 2020. "Informational Role of Open Interest and Transaction Volume of Options: A Meta-Analytic Review," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(4), pages 275-285, December.
    15. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Bartosz Kabaciński & Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg & Jacek Piotr Mizerka & Andreas Rathgeber & Agnieszka Stróżyńska-Szajek & Mikołaj Nowicki, 2024. "Real Earnings Management and Quality of Corporate Governance: A Meta-Regression Analysis," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 1-29.
    17. Nicolas Fleury & Fabrice Gilles, 2015. "A meta-regression analysis on intergenerational transmission of education: publication bias and genuine empirical effect," TEPP Working Paper 2015-02, TEPP.
    18. Gechert, Sebastian & Heimberger, Philipp, 2022. "Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas Velde & Jan Svejnar, 2017. "Effects Of Labor Reallocation On Productivity And Inequality—Insights From Studies On Transition," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 712-732, July.
    20. Sapana Bastola & Jerrod Penn & Juyoung Yoo, 2026. "Wetland proximity: a meta-analysis of hedonic property values," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 28(2), pages 543-563, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.