IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000234.html

Beyond 2050: From deployment to renewal of the global solar and wind energy system

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Le Bihan
  • Thomas Lapi
  • José Halloy

Abstract

The global energy transition depends on large-scale photovoltaic (PV) and wind power deployment. While 2050 targets suggest a transition endpoint, sustaining these systems beyond mid-century requires continuous renewal, marking a fundamental yet often overlooked shift in industrial dynamics. This study examines the transition from initial deployment to long-term renewal, using a two-phase growth model: an exponential expansion followed by capacity stabilization. By integrating this pattern with a Weibull distribution of PV panel and wind turbine lifespans, we estimate the annual production required for both expansion and maintenance. Our findings highlight two key factors influencing production dynamics: deployment speed and lifespan. When deployment duration (from 10% to 90% of target capacity) is shorter than 1.3 times the average lifespan, production overshoots and exhibits damped oscillations due to successive installation and replacement cycles. In contrast, gradual deployment leads to a smooth increase before stabilizing at the renewal rate. Given current growth rates, the PV industry could experience significant oscillations, from 20% to 150% of global production, while wind power follows a monotonic growth trajectory. These oscillations, driven by ambitious energy targets, may result in cycles of overproduction and underproduction, affecting industrial stability. Beyond solar and wind, this study underscores a broader challenge in the energy transition: shifting from infrastructure expansion to long-term maintenance. Addressing this phase is crucial for ensuring the resilience and sustainability of renewable energy systems beyond 2050.Author summary: The recent surge in photovoltaic and wind power is pivotal for the energy transition. While extensive literature projects growth up to 2050, the industrial challenges of the post-2050 era—specifically regarding infrastructure renewal—remain underexplored. This study investigates the manufacturing implications of sustaining renewable capacity through the end of the century, modeling a transition from rapid expansion to a renewal-driven saturation phase. Analyzing the International Energy Agency’s and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s scenarios, we find that rapid PV deployment risks creating significant “boom-and-bust” manufacturing cycles. Because massive quantities of panels are installed by 2040 with 30-year lifespans, a synchronized “replacement wave” emerges around 2060, causing extreme production volatility. Conversely, wind power does not exhibit these oscillations due to different deployment rates and lifespans. These cycles present a critical industrial dilemma. Mitigating them would require either slowing initial deployment, thereby jeopardizing climate targets, or shortening equipment lifespans, which increases resource consumption. Our findings highlight a fundamental trade-off in the energy transition: balancing urgent climate goals with material sobriety and long-term industrial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Le Bihan & Thomas Lapi & José Halloy, 2026. "Beyond 2050: From deployment to renewal of the global solar and wind energy system," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000234
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000234&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhai, Pei & Williams, Eric D., 2012. "Analyzing consumer acceptance of photovoltaics (PV) using fuzzy logic model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 350-357.
    2. Martin Chick, 2007. "Electricity and Energy Policy in Britain, France and the United States since 1945," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3650.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Bihan, Joseph & Lapi, Thomas & Halloy, José, 2026. "Materials constraints for long-term photovoltaic sustainability: renewal dynamics highlight critical mining and recycling needs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiruwork B. Tibebu & Eric Hittinger & Qing Miao & Eric Williams, 2024. "Adoption Model Choice Affects the Optimal Subsidy for Residential Solar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    3. Zhou, Angela & Thomaschke, Roland & Wessels, Andreas & Glunz, Stefan & Speck, Thomas & Kiesel, Andrea, 2024. "(Not) in my city: An explorative study on social acceptance of photovoltaic installations on buildings," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Frate, Claudio Albuquerque & Brannstrom, Christian, 2017. "Stakeholder subjectivities regarding barriers and drivers to the introduction of utility-scale solar photovoltaic power in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 346-352.
    5. Judith Clifton & Pierre Lanthier & Harm Schröter, 2011. "Regulating and deregulating the public utilities 1830--2010," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 659-672, August.
    6. Christian A. Oberst & Reinhard Madlener, 2015. "Prosumer Preferences Regarding the Adoption of Micro†Generation Technologies: Empirical Evidence for German Homeowners," Working Papers 2015.07, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    7. Prudence Dato, 2018. "Investment in Energy Efficiency, Adoption of Renewable Energy and Household Behavior: Evidence from OECD Countries," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(3), pages 213-244, May.
    8. Eric L. Prentis, 2014. "Deregulation & Privatization: Texas Electric Power Market Evidence," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 117-126.
    9. Martin Chick, 2011. "The 3 Rs: Regulation, risk and responsibility in British utilities since 1945," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 747-760, August.
    10. Tooraj Jamasb & Rabindra Nepal & Govinda Timilsina & Michael Toman, 2014. "Energy Sector Reform, Economic Efficiency and Poverty Reduction," Discussion Papers Series 529, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    11. Pascal da Costa & Bianka Shoai Tehrani, 2013. "An Analysis of the Investment Decisions on the European Electricity Markets, over the 1945-2013 Period," Working Papers hal-00995799, HAL.
    12. Glen O'Hara, 2009. "'What the electorate can be expected to swallow': Nationalisation, transnationalism and the shifting boundaries of the state in post-war Britain," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 501-528.
    13. Bianka Shoai Tehrani & Pascal da Costa & Danièle Attias, 2016. "Three investment scenarios for future nuclear reactors in Europe," Post-Print hal-00997005, HAL.
    14. Palmer, J. & Sorda, G. & Madlener, R., 2015. "Modeling the diffusion of residential photovoltaic systems in Italy: An agent-based simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 106-131.
    15. Theodoros Anagnostopoulos & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Stamatios Ntanos & Eleni Gkika & Sofia Asonitou, 2020. "Intelligent Predictive Analytics for Sustainable Business Investment in Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    16. Garrués-Irurzun, Josean, 2010. "Market power versus regulatory power in the Spanish electricity system, 1973-1996," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 655-666, February.
    17. Brenner, Werner & Adamovic, Nadja, 2019. "Creating Sustainable Photovoltaics for Smart Cities," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 531-535, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    18. Majah-Leah Ravago & James Roumasset, 2016. "The Public Economics of Electricity Policy with Philippine Applications," Working Papers 201613, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    19. Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk & Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Sylwia Flaszewska, 2021. "From Words to Deeds: The Impact of Pro-Environmental Self-Identity on Green Energy Purchase Intention," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Macdonald, Douglas, 2012. "State interest as an explanatory factor in the failure of the soft-path energy vision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 92-101.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.