IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0362488.html

Tranexamic acid for anemia in women of reproductive age: A systematic review of randomized trials

Author

Listed:
  • Sima Berendes
  • Katharine Ker
  • Hilary O D Critchley
  • Raoul Mansukhani
  • Ian Roberts

Abstract

Objective: The global target to halve the prevalence of anemia by 2025 has not been met. New strategies are needed. This systematic review examined the effect of tranexamic acid on anemia, menstrual health and wellbeing in women of reproductive age. Methods: We searched six databases from inception to 30 August 2025 and reference lists of seven related reviews. We included randomized trials comparing the effects of tranexamic acid with placebo or standard care on uterine bleeding. Eligible participants had normal menstrual bleeding or any type of non-pregnant abnormal uterine bleeding. Outcomes included hemoglobin concentration and anemia prevalence as the primary outcome, estimated blood loss, quality of life, thromboembolic events, and other adverse events. We conducted meta-analyses and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials) and the certainty of evidence. Results: We included 17 trials in the review and 15 in the meta-analyses. None of the trials reported adequate data on hemoglobin concentration. For the anemia outcome, only one small trial contributed data (risk ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 2.74, very low certainty). Meta-analyses of secondary outcomes showed that tranexamic acid reduced objectively measured menstrual blood loss among women with heavy menstrual bleeding (6 trials, mean difference −47.0 milliliters, 95% confidence interval −56.6 to −37.4, I2 = 13%, moderate certainty) and in women with intrauterine devices (3 trials, mean difference −41.6 milliliters, 95% confidence interval −52.2 to −30.9, I2 = 64%, low certainty) and improved quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (2 trials, mean difference 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 0.7, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty). The risk of nausea or vomiting was similar between groups (4 trials, risk ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 1.8, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty). Certainty of evidence for other outcomes ranged from very low to low, including for thromboembolic events, with only one event reported in the control arm of one trial. Conclusions: Tranexamic acid appears to reduce menstrual blood loss, but its impact on anemia is unclear. High-quality randomized trials of TXA for menstruating women with anemia are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sima Berendes & Katharine Ker & Hilary O D Critchley & Raoul Mansukhani & Ian Roberts, 2026. "Tranexamic acid for anemia in women of reproductive age: A systematic review of randomized trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0362488
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0362488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0362488
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0362488&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0362488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0362488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.