Author
Listed:
- Zefu Huang
- Nalini Arumugam
Abstract
In Chinese higher learning institutions, students learning English as a foreign language (EFL) often demonstrate low writing self-efficacy (WSE) and poor writing competence. The present study examined the associations between the integration of peer tutoring with collaborative writing and students’ WSE and writing outcomes from a psychological perspective. A quasi-experiment was implemented for 11 weeks for 100 Chinese university students studying EFL. Changes in WSE were examined, and writing competence was assessed using tests. The results showed a notable rise in students’ WSE after the instructional intervention. The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that gains in WSE were positively associated with the writing outcome after controlling for pretest writing competence and group membership, explaining 20.2% of the total variance. These results suggest that peer-supported collaborative writing was associated with higher EFL writing competence alongside increased WSE. These findings align with theoretical justifications based on peer scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development, although these processes were not directly measured in the present study. These findings imply that incorporating peer tutoring into collaborative writing might be associated with the development of WSE and improved writing competence among EFL students at Chinese universities. Increased WSE appeared to be a significant, albeit partial, predictor of writing competence, highlighting the potential relevance of WSE development in peer-supported collaborative writing contexts.
Suggested Citation
Zefu Huang & Nalini Arumugam, 2026.
"A psychological perspective on peer tutoring in EFL collaborative writing in Chinese higher education contexts,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-16, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0362263
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0362263
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0362263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.