IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0362007.html

Yield determinants in rice under organic and conventional production systems: Implications for selection strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Sushmitharaj Dhanalakshmi Veeraraj
  • Karthika Rajendran

Abstract

The persistent yield gap remains a major challenge in organic agriculture despite its increasing importance for sustainable food production. The present study compared the performance of 80 diverse rice genotypes (62 landraces and 18 modern varieties) under two contrasting production systems (organic and conventional). The experiment was conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2023 and 2024 using an alpha lattice design (8 × 10) with three replications. Agro-morphological and yield-related traits were analysed through pooled mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA), genetic variability parameters, correlation and path coefficient analyses, as well as principal component analysis (PCA). The results revealed significant genotypic variation and differential trait expression between the two production systems, with the relative contribution of agro-morphological traits to grain yield varying between production systems. Integrated analysis of genetic variability, correlation, path coefficient analysis, and principal component analysis identified production system-specific trait combinations associated with grain yield. Under the conventional production system, flag leaf breadth (FLB), number of productive tillers per plant (NPTP), hundred seed weight (HSW), and flag leaf length (FLL) were prominent traits, with strong positive direct effects in path analysis, whereas leaf area (LA), NPTP, HSW, plant height (PH), and days to 50% flowering (DFF) were prominent under the organic production system, also showing positive direct effects in path analysis. Genotypic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) estimates identified Ponmani samba (G40), Varakkal (G60), and Sengalapattu sirumani (G49) with the highest yield BLUP estimates under the organic production system, whereas Mani samba (G29), TKM1 (G80), and Bavani (G6) showed the highest yield BLUP estimates under the conventional production system. Milagu samba (G31), Polinel (G39), and Ponmani samba (G40) consistently ranked among the top-performing genotypes based on yield BLUP estimates across both production systems, indicating their potential as breeding materials for further evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sushmitharaj Dhanalakshmi Veeraraj & Karthika Rajendran, 2026. "Yield determinants in rice under organic and conventional production systems: Implications for selection strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0362007
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0362007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0362007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0362007&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0362007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0362007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.