Author
Abstract
Rising health insurance expenditure (HIE) poses fiscal risks and challenges to the sustainability of public insurance systems. Despite growing interest in data-driven analysis, empirical evidence on the associations between macroeconomic, social, and financial conditions and national HIE remains limited, particularly across provider types. This study introduces an explainable machine-learning framework with temporal predictive validation to analyze and forecast HIE using 60 macro-financial and socioeconomic indicators. The framework is applied to three monthly expenditure series from Korea’s National Health Insurance system (2000–2023). Predictive performance and interpretability are assessed using two univariate autoregressive baselines, three regularized linear indicator-based benchmarks, and six nonlinear indicator-based ensemble models. LightGBM serves as the primary explanatory model, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) quantifies indicator contributions and captures autoregressive persistence. Beyond associational insights, temporal predictive validation using lagged regression and Granger-type temporal predictive tests examines, within a prespecified exploratory lag window, whether SHAP-identified indicators show statistically supported exploratory lagged monitoring relevance. These results are interpreted as hypothesis-generating temporal monitoring evidence rather than as evidence of structural causal effects. Although persistence-based baselines achieved the strongest short-term forecasting accuracy, indicator-based models provided model-conditional explanatory information beyond autoregressive controls. The results indicate that shared macroeconomic pressures and provider-specific factors are associated with HIE predictions. The cost-of-living index is consistently associated with expenditure patterns across categories, whereas domestic demand and external conditions indicate provider-specific associations for medical institutions and pharmacies. Only a subset of predictors retained exploratory lagged monitoring support, underscoring the distinction between model-based predictive importance and hypothesis-generating monitoring signals. This integrated framework may inform transparent fiscal risk monitoring hypotheses and contextual review of public HIE.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.