Author
Abstract
The county high school policies (CHSPs) is crucial for improving the quality of basic education in China’s counties and promoting rural social development. As policy documents are the foundational elements of policy systems, it is crucial to evaluate current policy texts, identify their shortcomings, and provide empirical evidence for future policy development. This study collected 55 policy texts from provincial and municipal governments, utilizing the Policy Modeling Consistency index model to evaluate 14 representative policies. The results indicate that all the assessed policies fall within the“pass”,“good”,or“with distinction” score category, with no substandard policies identified and none achieving a “perfect” score.A detailed analysis identifies critical policy shortcomings, including the prioritization of short-to-medium-term strategies over long-term planning, fragmented enrollment systems, insufficient campus culture development, as well as limited career guidance, mental health support,and policy guidance for home-school-community joint education. Local governments adopt a conservative stance on educational policy evaluation and systemic institutional reforms.To address these issues, this study recommends that local governments integrate the enrollment systems of public and private high schools within their jurisdictions, strengthen the prohibition of on cross-regional enrollment, increase investment in students’ career guidance and mental health education, and launch more programs to encourage parents and communities to participate in school education. Moreover, the central government should urge local authorities to accelerate reforms in the high school education system.
Suggested Citation
Qiulin Wu & Guanghai Li, 2026.
"A quantitative assessment of Chinese county high school policies using the PMC index model,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-23, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0361807
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361807
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.