IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0361572.html

Gradient boosting models for gallstone disease classification: A comparative study using demographic and clinical data

Author

Listed:
  • Kazi Sakib Hasan
  • Sumaiya Hossain Puspita

Abstract

Gallstone disease is a prevalent gastrointestinal condition with a substantial healthcare burden. While abdominal ultrasonography is the established first-line diagnostic modality, opportunistic risk stratification using routinely collected health parameters remains underexplored. This study evaluated the discriminatory capacity of four gradient boosting machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and HistGBM) for classifying gallstone status using demographic, bioimpedance, and routine laboratory features. A retrospective clinical dataset of 319 patients (161 gallstone-positive individuals and 158 healthy controls) from Ankara VM Medical Park Hospital was analyzed. Model performance was assessed using repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation, evaluated via AUC-ROC, accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with SHAP analyses employed for model interpretability. CatBoost achieved the highest discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.862±0.061, accuracy = 0.794±0.075) and the lowest Brier score (0.149±0.037), demonstrating statistically significant superiority over competing architectures (Friedman test, p

Suggested Citation

  • Kazi Sakib Hasan & Sumaiya Hossain Puspita, 2026. "Gradient boosting models for gallstone disease classification: A comparative study using demographic and clinical data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361572
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361572&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0361572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.