Author
Listed:
- Wanqi Tang
- Libang He
- Min Zhang
- Jiyao Li
Abstract
Edentulism may contribute to functional disability in older adults, yet cross-national evidence combining multiple analytic strategies and mechanistic assessment remains limited. This study examined the association between edentulism and disability in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) across England, the United States, and India. We analyzed harmonized data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA; n = 9,102), the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n = 22,156), and the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI; n = 31,816) for adults aged 60 years or older. Cross-sectional associations were estimated using inverse probability weighting (IPW) and augmented IPW. Longitudinal Cox proportional hazards models were applied in ELSA and HRS. Mediation through grip strength, body mass index (BMI), and depressive symptoms was assessed with counterfactual causal mediation analysis on the risk-difference scale. Edentulism was associated with higher odds of ADL (pooled odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.20–1.42) and IADL disability (1.27, 1.11–1.45). Longitudinal analyses confirmed elevated hazard ratios for incident ADL (1.19, 1.09–1.30) and IADL disability (1.30, 1.19–1.43). Grip strength accounted for the largest proportion mediated (approximately 50% in ELSA and HRS, and 5–14% in LASI); BMI and depressive symptoms showed little mediation. In LASI, denture use among edentulous participants was associated with lower disability odds. Edentulism was consistently associated with functional disability across three countries, with grip strength partially accounting for this association, although the cross-sectional design precludes establishing temporality. Oral rehabilitation may partly buffer this risk and merits further prospective investigation.
Suggested Citation
Wanqi Tang & Libang He & Min Zhang & Jiyao Li, 2026.
"Edentulism and functional disability in older adults: A longitudinal and cross-national study in England, the United States, and India,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-20, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0361422
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361422
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.