IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0361397.html

Vertical accuracy of ASTER, SRTM, and NASADEM digital surface models across Malawi’s diverse topography

Author

Listed:
  • Kennedy Sones Nazombe
  • Brighton A Chunga
  • Charles Bakolo
  • Rodrick Mlewa
  • Godwell Nhamo

Abstract

Digital Surface Models (DSMs) are widely used as important sources of topographic information for earth science and environmental applications. The accuracy of DSMs has direct impacts on several environmental calculations and processes. Therefore, it is imperative to select the most suitable DSM based on the aim and accuracy requirements of each application. However, the use of an appropriate DSM has always been a challenge. This study evaluated the vertical accuracy and performance of the freely available Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), NASA DEM (NASADEM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). The DSM elevations were measured against high-precision national geodetic control points. Among other accuracy metrics, we computed Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and examined the influence of elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, and land cover. At the national scale, SRTM (RMSE of 19.55 m) and NASADEM (RMSE of 19.99 m) showed comparable performance, while ASTER produced a higher RMSE of 22.13 m. However, the principal finding was that DSM accuracy varied substantially across Malawi’s diverse terrain. All the DSMs performed particularly well in the low-lying Lower Shire Valley, with RMSEs of 3.25 m (NASADEM), 4.30 m (SRTM), and 6.91 m (ASTER). Errors increased markedly in the Highlands, where RMSE reached 35.03 m for NASADEM, 33.62 m for SRTM, and 36.94 m for ASTER. In addition, accuracy decreased with increasing elevation and slope, particularly in highland regions and on slopes steeper than 30°. Aspect showed the highest relative importance in the Random Forest analysis. However, the differences in accuracy among aspect classes were comparatively modest, and greater underestimation was observed on north- and west-facing slopes. These findings demonstrate that national-scale accuracy statistics alone do not adequately describe DSM suitability across Malawi’s diverse landscapes. DSM selection should therefore consider the terrain and land-cover characteristics of the intended application area.

Suggested Citation

  • Kennedy Sones Nazombe & Brighton A Chunga & Charles Bakolo & Rodrick Mlewa & Godwell Nhamo, 2026. "Vertical accuracy of ASTER, SRTM, and NASADEM digital surface models across Malawi’s diverse topography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361397
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361397
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361397&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0361397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.