IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0361301.html

Exploratory baseline mucosal transcriptomics and vedolizumab response in ulcerative colitis

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Zhang
  • Jian Liu
  • Chenfei Liang
  • Qiang Han
  • Da Li
  • Yali Wang

Abstract

Currently, there are still no reliable pre-treatment biomarkers for vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis. To investigate baseline mucosal signals, we reconstructed the discovery cohort from GSE73661 and evaluated the derived panel in the blood samples from GSE191328 and the independent mucosal RNA-seq cohorts from E-MTAB-7845. The reconstructed cohort comprised 24 baseline samples, including 14 composite responders and 10 non-responders. Through repeated LASSO variable selection, the study identified an exploratory gene set consisting of ZNF689, TPRXL, ZC3H10, and MRPL55. The selection procedure yielded a mean held-out AUC of 0.611 across 18 complete nested-validation repetitions; this does not independently validate the final gene set. When the fixed gene set was projected exploratorily, the AUC for 17 blood samples was 0.458 (95% CI 0.162–0.755), and the AUC for 27 independent UC mucosal samples was 0.534 (95% CI 0.293–0.775). The apparent AUC of this gene set on the discovery set was 1.000, and 500 full-process bootstrap analyses indicated that gene selection was unstable. Among the three targeted inflammatory panels, interferon-γ showed a directional difference that was not statistically significant (mean GSVA score difference −0.425; nominal P = 0.066; adjusted P = 0.197). Expression scales and clinical endpoints differed across cohorts. The above results describe post-selection separation within the discovery cohort and do not establish reproducible predictive performance, tissue specificity, or a definitive four-gene signature.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Zhang & Jian Liu & Chenfei Liang & Qiang Han & Da Li & Yali Wang, 2026. "Exploratory baseline mucosal transcriptomics and vedolizumab response in ulcerative colitis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361301
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361301&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0361301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.