IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0361211.html

The detection paradox: How COVID-19 surveillance patterns shifted from lower-income to more affluent neighborhoods in Miami-Dade County

Author

Listed:
  • Levente Juhász
  • Nana Aisha Garba
  • Imelda K Moise
  • Prasad B Bhoite
  • Christopher Clark
  • Rachel D Clarke
  • Nicole Kikuchi Stuver
  • David R Brown

Abstract

Passive disease surveillance systems may systematically undercount burden in low-resource minority neighborhoods, yet fine-scale evidence of this phenomenon remains limited. We examined spatiotemporal patterns of reported COVID-19 cases across Miami-Dade County's diverse neighborhoods and investigated which socioeconomic and demographic characteristics predicted areas of elevated and suppressed case rates. In an ecological, cross-sectional analysis of 491,769 geocoded cases across 1,831 census block groups from March 2020 to May 2021, we applied negative binomial regression with spatial eigenvector filtering and Getis-Ord Gi* hot spot analysis across five pandemic periods aligned with major policy shifts.The analysis revealed a detection paradox. Early hot spots concentrated in lower-income census block groups (median household income: $52,022–$55,676), but by September 2020, hot spots had shifted to more affluent areas (median: $77,069). Historically Black neighborhoods along the I-95 corridor emerged as persistent cold spots despite multiple structural risk factors: lower incomes, reduced insurance coverage, and limited healthcare access. From Period 3 onward, predominantly Black census block groups showed significantly lower reported rates (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.991–0.995, p

Suggested Citation

  • Levente Juhász & Nana Aisha Garba & Imelda K Moise & Prasad B Bhoite & Christopher Clark & Rachel D Clarke & Nicole Kikuchi Stuver & David R Brown, 2026. "The detection paradox: How COVID-19 surveillance patterns shifted from lower-income to more affluent neighborhoods in Miami-Dade County," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361211
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0361211&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0361211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.