Author
Listed:
- Amanda K Sesko
- Alexandra N Fisher
- Monica Biernat
Abstract
Invisibility is the experience of not being attended to, remembered, differentiated from others, or given credit for contributions. In the current registered report, we aim to validate the Experienced Invisibility Scale (EIS), a measure designed to capture experiences of invisibility, which are most likely to be experienced by people with multiple stigmatized identities. As proof of concept, we first present a pilot study testing the factor structure of the EIS, in which we found that: 1) a bifactor model (“unheard” and “unnoticed”) best represents the structure of experienced invisibility, but that calculating a total score is likely to be sufficient for most purposes, 2) the EIS is most likely to be experienced by those with multiple stigmatized identities, and 3) initial tests of convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity were supported. We then propose three studies to further validate the EIS and its links to social identities. Study 1 will distinguish the EIS from related constructs of social exclusion, objectification, rejection sensitivity, positive and negative affect, and other experiences of discrimination, test the temporal stability of the EIS, and examine relationships with well-being. Study 2 will examine whether the EIS predicts additional outcomes including health, low felt impact, perceived powerlessness, and denial of services or power. Study 3 will test hypotheses that Black women (compared to White women and Black and White men) will report experiencing more invisibility, and will show stronger relationships between invisibility and negative outcomes. We hope this work will aid scholars in better understanding invisibility as a form of discrimination.
Suggested Citation
Amanda K Sesko & Alexandra N Fisher & Monica Biernat, 2026.
"Capturing experienced invisibility among people with multiple stigmatized identities: The experienced invisibility scale protocol,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-24, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0361028
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0361028
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0361028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.