IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0360948.html

Estimating direct and indirect costs of hospitalised typhoid fever in Indonesia: A multisite healthcare facility and community survey

Author

Listed:
  • Jarir At Thobari
  • Ida Safitri Laksono
  • Jonathan Hasian Haposan
  • Hardini Tri Indarti
  • Asal Wahyuni Erlin Mulyadi
  • Alindina Anjani
  • Emma Watts
  • Julie Bines

Abstract

Background: Typhoid fever, caused by the bacterium Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi), remains a major global threat despite substantial declines over the past three decades. In 2021, an estimated 7.1 million (5.6 to 9.2 million) cases occurred worldwide. Following the WHO’s recommendation, ten countries (excluding Indonesia) have introduced the typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV). To inform decision-making for the potential introduction of TCV into Indonesia’s National Immunisation Program, we estimated the direct and indirect costs of typhoid fever in Indonesia. Methods: We conducted a multisite, incidence-based cost-of-illness study using a patient-level bottom-up costing approach in 23 hospitals and primary health centres (PHCs) across six provinces. Children (6 months to 17 years) and adults (≥18 years) hospitalised with ICD-10 A01 typhoid fever hospitalised with at least one positive typhoid serodiagnostic result during 2019-2023 (retrospective) and 2022-2023 (prospective), without other major infectious or chronic comorbidities, were identified from facility records. Direct medical costs were obtained retrospectively from hospital/PHC bills and clinical records, while direct non-medical and indirect (productivity loss) costs were collected prospectively through interviewer-administered household questionnaires. Sensitivity analyses re-estimated costs after excluding component-wise outliers and imputing missing income values using the provincial minimum wage. Results: We collected 2,069 records (1,538 retrospective [891 children; 647 adults] and 531 prospective [329 children; 202 adults]) across six provinces. The weighted mean direct medical costs were US$177.0 ± 101.9 for children and US$199.8 ± 119.8 for adults, while the corresponding direct non-medical costs were US$43.7 ± 16.3 and US$39.0 ± 10.9, respectively. Indirect costs were US$23.9. ± 5.6 (children) and US$17.9 ± 5.5 (adults). Private hospitals had the highest total direct medical cost (US$254.4), while PHCs had the lowest (US$47.8). Costs varied substantially by provinces (BPJS tariff regions). Conclusion: Hospitalised typhoid fever imposes a substantial economic burden in Indonesia. These setting- and region-specific cost estimates can inform cost projections and cost-effectiveness analyses for the introduction of the typhoid conjugate vaccine in Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarir At Thobari & Ida Safitri Laksono & Jonathan Hasian Haposan & Hardini Tri Indarti & Asal Wahyuni Erlin Mulyadi & Alindina Anjani & Emma Watts & Julie Bines, 2026. "Estimating direct and indirect costs of hospitalised typhoid fever in Indonesia: A multisite healthcare facility and community survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360948
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360948
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360948&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0360948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.