IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0360863.html

Vaping and smoking as risk factors for arthritis: Evidence from double machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Onyedikachi Emmanuel Chike
  • Syed Badruddoza
  • Conrad Lyford

Abstract

Smoking is a well-documented risk factor for chronic diseases, including arthritis. Vaping, often marketed as a safer alternative, has risen sharply, yet its implications for musculoskeletal health remain unclear. We examine the associations of vaping and smoking with arthritis using Double Machine Learning (DML), and present illustrative economic scenarios projecting the potential cost implications of arthritis cases associated with these behaviors. Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), collected in the United States, for adults aged 18–64 years (N = 36,768) is used. Arthritis is the outcome variable; vaping and smoking are the exposure variables, with estimates conditioned on twenty-seven demographic, behavioral, and health-related covariates (See Table 1). Results show that vaping is associated with a 2.12 percentage point higher prevalence of arthritis than among non-vapers, while smoking is associated with a 2.22 percentage points increase compared with non-smokers. When accounting for concurrent nicotine behaviors, the estimated associations remain largely stable, with smoking exhibiting a slightly larger estimate of 2.14 percentage points while vaping attenuated to 1.91 percentage points. Vaping was estimated to be associated with approximately 190,581–254,109 arthritis cases annually, corresponding to a potential economic cost projection of $133.4--$177.9 million. Smoking was statistically associated with approximately 518,886–687,413 cases, corresponding to $363.2 –$481.2 million. Combined, the projected economic burden associated with vaping and smoking was approximately $496.6–$659.1 million annually under conservative assumptions. Relative to published estimates of the total U.S. arthritis burden, these projections represent approximately 0.09%–0.22% of arthritis-related expenditures under direct healthcare cost assumptions and up to 9.23% when broader indirect and societal costs are considered. Our findings suggest that vaping is associated with musculoskeletal risk comparable to, or potentially exceeding, that of smoking, and do not support the perception of vaping as a risk-free alternative. The illustrative projections may inform policy discussions on vaping and smoking in relation to the broader arthritis-related health and economic burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Onyedikachi Emmanuel Chike & Syed Badruddoza & Conrad Lyford, 2026. "Vaping and smoking as risk factors for arthritis: Evidence from double machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360863
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360863&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0360863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.