Author
Listed:
- Haniyeh Rezaie
- Aeen Mohammadi
- Rita Mojtahedzadeh
- Maryam Aaalaa
- Nikoo Yamani
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid global evolution of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), combined with the shift toward e-learning in higher education, has made it more necessary than ever to equip faculty members with technological skills. The level of self-efficacy significantly influences technological competence in educational technology. This study aimed to translate and conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Duke University School of Nursing's self-assessment of educational technology competencies: DUSAETCS for faculty members. Method: The psychometric properties of the DUSAETCS questionnaire, comprising 44 items, were evaluated. The original questionnaire was translated into Persian via back translation. Internal and external consistencies, factor analysis, and construct validity analysis were examined. Results: Of the initial 44 items, 26 were retained following the assessment of content validity using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI). The overall CVI and CVR were 0.79 and 0.99, respectively. The Persian version of the questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.92 for the total scale. Conclusions: The findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the content validity and internal consistency of the Persian version of the DUSAETCS for assessing faculty members’ educational technology competencies in the context of e-teaching. Further psychometric evaluation, particularly assessment of construct validity and other reliability measures, is recommended before broader application of the instrument.
Suggested Citation
Haniyeh Rezaie & Aeen Mohammadi & Rita Mojtahedzadeh & Maryam Aaalaa & Nikoo Yamani, 2026.
"Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the DUSAETCS questionnaire: Duke University Self-Assessment Educational Technology Competencies,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-16, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0360635
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360635
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.