IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0360422.html

Optimized bilateral segmentation deep learning network for wild animal detection

Author

Listed:
  • Srikanth Busa
  • Johnwesily Chappidi
  • Gunakala Archana
  • Anitha Rani Palakayala
  • Guggilam Venkata Vidya Lakshmi
  • Khasim Syed
  • Shaik Salma Asiya Begum

Abstract

The use of Deep learning (DL) for recognition of wild animals has become an important development in wildlife monitoring. The advances will include the use of multimodal data for improved accuracy and development of lightweight models for use in edge devices. As a result, DL will help contribute to global conservation efforts as it tackles the issues. The key novelty of the proposed framework is the integration of bilateral segmentation with DL to enhance relevant animal feature extraction while reducing the influence of complex background information. The paper proposes the Optimized Bilateral Segmentation DL Network that uses Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) to improve Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) parameters for wild animal identification. The first step in the process was collecting datasets from various online sources. The image quality was improved through image processing methods such as Adaptive Histogram Equalization (AHE) as well as median filtering. The classifier was trained and validated using pre-processed images. This classifier combines the Bilateral Segmentation Deep Learning Network (BSDLN) with the HHO algorithm. CNN is utilized for detection and the weight parameter is utilized by HHO. In order to enhance model convergence also with performance, HHO dynamically adjusts the learning rate during training within the BSDLN. This balances speed and accuracy by adapting to gradients and losses behavior. By adaptively adjusting the learning rate, HHO and BSDLN optimize the CNN learning process and enhance convergence and classification performance. The suggested approach is put into practice in Python, and statistical metrics are used to assess its effectiveness. The results are compared with other approaches to verify the strategy’s efficacy. With just 0.2% FPR and 0.3% FNR, the suggested BSDLN performed the best overall, achieving 99.4% precision, 99.8% accuracy, 99.6% recall, 99.5% F1-score, and 99.3% specificity. The experimental findings show that the combination of HHO and bilateral segmentation enhances the efficacy of wild animal detection, offering a strong foundation for automated wildlife monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Srikanth Busa & Johnwesily Chappidi & Gunakala Archana & Anitha Rani Palakayala & Guggilam Venkata Vidya Lakshmi & Khasim Syed & Shaik Salma Asiya Begum, 2026. "Optimized bilateral segmentation deep learning network for wild animal detection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360422
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360422&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0360422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.