IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0360412.html

Unsafe firearm storage among family caregivers of older persons living with dementia

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaming Liang
  • Alexander Testa

Abstract

Purpose: Firearm access in dementia caregiving households poses safety risks. This study examines household firearm ownership and storage practices among dementia caregivers, identifying factors associated with unsafe firearm storage. Methods: We analyzed pooled data from 2017, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Weighted logistic regression assessed associations between caregiver characteristics and firearm storage behaviors (unloaded vs. loaded, locked vs. unlocked). Results: Dementia caregivers were more likely to live in firearm-owning households than non-caregivers (40.57% vs. 35.12%). Among caregivers in firearm-owning households, 35.8% reported loaded storage, and 50.8% of those also reported unlocked storage. Older caregivers are more likely to report unlocked firearm storage (50–64 years: OR=3.74, 95%CI: 1.75–8.01; 65 + years: OR=5.39, 95%CI: 2.02–14.40; reference: 5 years: OR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.16–0.78) and assisting with household tasks (OR=0.27, 95%CI: 0.11–0.63) were associated with safer storage, though this protective effect was only observed among younger caregivers. Conclusion: Household firearm storage patterns among dementia caregivers varied by caregiver age, sex, and caregiving context, highlighting the need for tailored firearm-safety counseling and caregiver-focused public health strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaming Liang & Alexander Testa, 2026. "Unsafe firearm storage among family caregivers of older persons living with dementia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360412
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0360412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.