IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0360238.html

Dietary and lifestyle quality and endometrial cancer: Incidence and survivorship outcomes—An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Ruqaiya Al Ramadhani
  • Newshaw Arvin
  • Saphy Moussa
  • Monika Janda
  • Mary C Playdon
  • Andreas Obermair

Abstract

Composite dietary and lifestyle indices capture the combined effects of multiple health-related behaviours and may better reflect real-world cancer risk and survivorship than single exposures. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate and grade the strength of evidence for associations between adherence to composite dietary and lifestyle quality indices and endometrial cancer (EC) outcomes, including risk, EC-specific survival, overall survival, disease recurrence, quality of life, and new-onset cardiometabolic diseases. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant systematic reviews. Evidence was graded using prespecified umbrella review criteria. A total of 21 systematic reviews were included. Nine investigated diet quality (7 meta-analyses) and 12 investigated lifestyle exposure or interventions (8 meta-analyses). The outcomes assessed were EC risk (N = 14), all-cause or cancer-specific mortality (N = 5), recurrence (N = 4), overall or cancer-specific survival (N = 3), QoL (N = 5), and cardiometabolic events (N = 1). Following a Mediterranean diet was associated with 29% lower odds of EC (pooled OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.98; class IV), whereas Western dietary patterns were associated with 20% higher odds of EC (pooled OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.39; class IV). A combined healthy diet and lifestyle approach was associated with a 46% lower hazard of EC incidence (pooled HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0.71; class III), although heterogeneity was high. No significant associations were observed between lifestyle interventions and global or domain-specific quality of life (QoL) across follow-up durations ranging from 9 weeks to 12 months, irrespective of the validated assessment instruments used. Evidence remains limited regarding the associations between diet and lifestyle factors and EC recurrence, survival, mortality, and cardiometabolic outcomes. Our umbrella review identified suggestive (class III–IV) evidence for associations between healthy dietary patterns, particularly the Mediterranean diet, and combined healthy lifestyle approaches with lower EC incidence. Evidence remains insufficient or non‐significant for post-diagnosis outcomes, underscoring the need for further high-quality research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruqaiya Al Ramadhani & Newshaw Arvin & Saphy Moussa & Monika Janda & Mary C Playdon & Andreas Obermair, 2026. "Dietary and lifestyle quality and endometrial cancer: Incidence and survivorship outcomes—An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360238
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360238&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0360238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.