IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0360079.html

Integrating Quantum Machine Learning and Ontology Matching for Efficient Semantic Web Services discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Naif Alatawi

Abstract

Existing Semantic Web Service (SWS) discovery approaches based on classical machine learning suffer from limited representational capacity in high-dimensional semantic feature spaces and fail to fully exploit structured ontological knowledge for semantic alignment. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a hybrid framework that integrates Quantum Machine Learning (QML) models with multi-type Ontology Matching to improve both the accuracy and semantic coverage of SWS discovery. In this paper, we discuss the use of quantum machine learning models and ontological matching techniques for the discovery of Semantic Web Services (SWS) in the Semantic Web. We contrast the effectiveness of different quantum machine learning models with their classical counterparts, including Quantum k-Nearest Neighbors (QkNN), Quantum Decision Trees, Quantum Random Forest, and Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM). Our experiments on the OWLS-TC v4 benchmark demonstrate that QSVM achieved the highest post-integration accuracy of 95.1% when paired with graph-based ontology matching, while Quantum Random Forest achieved the highest standalone accuracy of 92.2% without ontology matching. QSVM’s standalone accuracy was 63.0%, reflecting its sensitivity to noisy feature representations in the absence of semantic enrichment; ontology matching consistently recovered and surpassed its performance. Tables 7 through 10 report post-integration results per matching method. Table 13 reports standalone baseline accuracy. These two result sets are distinct and complementary, not contradictory. The application of ontological matching techniques to SWS discovery made the accuracy of SWS discovering much better in both quantum and classical machine learning models. QkNN was the one with the greatest accuracy improvement of 2.8% after adding ontological matching in the mix. Our results indicate that quantum machine learning models, for example Quantum Random Forest (QRF) and Quantum k-Nearest Neighbors (QkNN), are the best candidates for the discovery of SWS. The application of ontological matching methods together with machine learning models is advisable for the improvement of the accuracy of the SWS discovery process. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that the efficiency of these methods may be different depending on the accuracy and the completeness of the ontologies that are the basis. This research gives a useful information about the possible of quantum machine learning models and ontological matching techniques for enhancing the SWS finding accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Naif Alatawi, 2026. "Integrating Quantum Machine Learning and Ontology Matching for Efficient Semantic Web Services discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-38, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360079
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360079
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360079&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0360079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.