IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0359844.html

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A data-driven approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sander C J Verfaillie
  • Anouk Verveen
  • Denise Visser
  • Pythia Nieuwkerk
  • Brent Appelman
  • Ronald Boellaard
  • Caroline M van Heugten
  • Janneke Horn
  • Hanneke E Hulst
  • Menno D de Jong
  • Tanja A Kuut
  • Tessa van der Maaden
  • Yvonne M G van Os
  • Maria Prins
  • Johanna M A Visser-Meily
  • Michele van Vugt
  • Cees C van den Wijngaard
  • Bart N M van Berckel
  • Jos A Bosch
  • Nelleke Tolboom
  • Hans Knoop

Abstract

It is important to determine whether the persistent cognitive and fatigue complaints, as part of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), are associated with underlying patterns and specific symptoms clusters. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate symptom clusters and clinical phenotypes in PASC. We included n = 153 individuals (53 years old, 66% female, 2 years post SARS-CoV-2 infection) categorized into groups with (n = 88) and without (n = 65) PASC, defined by severe fatigue and concentration problems using validated cut-offs. Symptom clusters (i.e., component loadings and component scores) were identified using principal component analyses (PCA, eigenvalue[EV]>1.0), using clinical, somatic, coping and sleep factors, symptom severity, neuropsychological and physical tests (totalling 19 tests and questionnaires). We then used logistic regression techniques on (participant-level) component scores (standardized) to investigate associations with PASC. Finally, K-means clustering methods to identify clinical phenotypes. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, nationality and time since infection. PCA identified 5 components, explaining 70% of the variance. We labelled these components as follows: (1) PEM, ME/CFS and sleep symptoms, coping factors (EV = 7.0, 36.9% variance), (2) information-processing speed (EV = 2.5, 13.3%), (3) executive functioning (EV = 1.5, 8.0%, (4) physical performance (EV = 1.2, 6.5%), (5) somatic comorbidities and hospital admission (EV = 1.0, 5.5%). Logistic regression showed that only the first component scores (Odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 97.1 [16.5–570.3], p 0.05), associated with PASC. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct clinical phenotypes among individuals with severe chronic fatigue: one marked by physical impairment and the other by diminished cognitive performance. Consistent with existing literature, we confirmed that PASC is a heterogeneous syndrome marked by extensive, interrelated symptoms. Notably, we identified specific cognitive and physical clinical phenotypes. These findings are important for future targeted diagnosis and treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander C J Verfaillie & Anouk Verveen & Denise Visser & Pythia Nieuwkerk & Brent Appelman & Ronald Boellaard & Caroline M van Heugten & Janneke Horn & Hanneke E Hulst & Menno D de Jong & Tanja A Kuut , 2026. "Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A data-driven approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359844
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359844
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359844&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0359844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.