Author
Listed:
- Alison McAfee
- Brendan Daisley
- Dylan J L Brettingham
- Elizabeth Mallory
- Christine Macpherson
- Armando Alcazar Magaña
- Emma Allen-Vercoe
- David R Tarpy
- Leonard J Foster
Abstract
Canada imports approximately 300,000 honey bee queens annually to support the beekeeping industry, in addition to producing queens domestically during the short rearing season. Over 80% of imported queens come from the U.S., with additional contributions (~5% each) from Italy, Australia, and Chile. We conducted morphometric analysis and pheromone profiling of domestic and imported queens representing all four dominant exporting countries, including “vaccinated” (transgenerational immune-primed, or TGIP) and non-TGIP queens from the U.S., to compare their physical and pheromonal qualities. Imported queens differed morphometrically from domestic queens, and this difference was driven by smaller ovary size (a plastic metric exhibiting transient changes due to temporary confinement). Queen retinue pheromone (QRP) profiles also differed in domestic and imported queens, and PERMANOVA analysis showed that transit duration and ovary size were the top two explanatory factors. TGIP queens tended to have lower pheromone abundances than non-TGIP queens; a pattern that does not appear to be driven by pre-existing morphological differences. This study did not assess whether morphometric and pheromone differences affect acceptance rates or performance, nor whether immune priming offers benefits if pheromone discrepancies are enduring. By the measured laboratory metrics, domestic (Canadian) queens are comparable or better on several dimensions and investment in local production appears justified.
Suggested Citation
Alison McAfee & Brendan Daisley & Dylan J L Brettingham & Elizabeth Mallory & Christine Macpherson & Armando Alcazar Magaña & Emma Allen-Vercoe & David R Tarpy & Leonard J Foster, 2026.
"Pheromone and morphometric features of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens imported to Canada from around the globe,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0359657
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359657
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.