IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0359571.html

Exploring patient perspectives on barriers contributing to lost to follow-up in hypertension care: A qualitative study in a tertiary-care hospital in Coastal Karnataka, India

Author

Listed:
  • Raksha Kamath
  • Weena Stanley
  • Partha Protim Hazarika
  • Shwetha Tumkur Shivakumar
  • Bhageerathy Reshmi

Abstract

Background: Hypertension requires lifelong treatment and regular follow-up to prevent complications; however, lost to follow-up (LTFU) remains a major challenge in long-term hypertension care, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Objective: This study explored patient perspectives on barriers contributing to LTFU in hypertension management. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among 32 hypertensive patients who were LTFU at a tertiary care hospital in Coastal Karnataka, India. Participants were aged 31–69years, with 21 (65.6%) men and 11 (34.4%) women. Participants were identified through hospital records and interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were conducted from February to April 2026 Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically following COREQ guidelines. Results: Six major themes emerged.: (1) illness perception and self-management practices, (2) care-seeking and follow-up behaviour, (3) structural and socioeconomic barriers, (4) health system and continuity gaps, (5) patient-perceived strategies to improve continuity of care, and (6) health information continuity and interoperability needs. Participants described symptom-driven healthcare seeking, medication non-adherence, occupational responsibilities, and competing family priorities contributing to irregular follow-up. Financial burden, including treatment costs, transportation expenses, and wage loss, substantially affected continuity of care. Long travel distances, dependence on family members, overcrowding, rushed consultations, and inadequate follow-up mechanisms further influenced disengagement from care. Participants also reported fragmented healthcare utilisation, repeated investigations, dependence on paper-based records, and poor continuity of medical information across healthcare facilities. Several participants perceived that integrated digital health information systems, decentralised services, appointment reminders, and improved counselling could strengthen long-term hypertension follow-up. Conclusions: LTFU in hypertension care is influenced by interconnected individual, socioeconomic, and health system-related barriers. A notable finding was the fragmented nature of continuity of care and poor health information continuity across healthcare facilities. Strengthening patient-centred follow-up systems, decentralised chronic disease services, financial protection mechanisms, and interoperable health information systems may improve continuity of hypertension care and reduce long-term disengagement from chronic disease management.

Suggested Citation

  • Raksha Kamath & Weena Stanley & Partha Protim Hazarika & Shwetha Tumkur Shivakumar & Bhageerathy Reshmi, 2026. "Exploring patient perspectives on barriers contributing to lost to follow-up in hypertension care: A qualitative study in a tertiary-care hospital in Coastal Karnataka, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359571
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359571
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359571&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0359571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.