IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0359274.html

Effects of exercise interventions on gait, motor function, and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis with clinical implications

Author

Listed:
  • Chengshuo Zhang
  • Zhen Jia
  • Yongdi Wang
  • Wanli Zang

Abstract

Objective: Evidence regarding the effects of exercise interventions on gait-related symptoms, motor function, and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains uncertain across outcome measures and intervention characteristics. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ), Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Methods: Standardized mean differences (SMDs; Hedges’ g) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects restricted maximum likelihood models. Exploratory subgroup analyses examined age, disease duration, intervention duration, training frequency, single-session duration, and exercise modality as potential sources of heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261281718). Results: The meta-analysis included 20 randomized controlled trials published between 2009 and 2024, involving 714 patients with PD, including 372 participants in the exercise intervention groups and 342 in the control groups. Sixteen trials were judged as having some concerns and four as having a high overall risk of bias; none was rated as low risk. Compared with control conditions, exercise interventions were associated with lower FOGQ scores (SMD = −0.62, 95% CI −1.06 to −0.18) and UPDRS-III scores (SMD = −0.80, 95% CI −1.02 to −0.59), and higher BBS scores (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.42). The pooled effect for Mini-BESTest was not statistically significant (SMD = 0.23, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.70). Exploratory subgroup analyses did not establish differential effects according to exercise modality, dose parameters, age, or disease duration. The certainty of evidence was moderate for UPDRS-III and low for FOGQ, BBS, and Mini-BESTest. Conclusion: Exercise interventions may improve freezing-of-gait symptoms, overall motor function, and some aspects of balance performance in patients with PD, although evidence for Mini-BESTest outcomes remains inconclusive. Given the limited certainty of evidence and methodological limitations of the included trials, these findings warrant cautious interpretation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengshuo Zhang & Zhen Jia & Yongdi Wang & Wanli Zang, 2026. "Effects of exercise interventions on gait, motor function, and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis with clinical implications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359274
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359274
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359274&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0359274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.