IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0359156.html

Measuring planetary health knowledge: Development and psychometric evaluation of a taxonomy-based test

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Rees
  • Oliver Wilhelm

Abstract

Planetary Health Knowledge (PHK) refers to knowledge about global conditions and interrelations between the health of the planet, human health, and human civilization. In times of various humanitarian and environmental crises, knowledge about and awareness of these problems become increasingly important. This is reflected in the Sustainable Development Goals and various Global Citizenship Education programs that emphasize the importance of knowledge about global challenges as a key characteristic in promoting sustainability. Despite its relevance, a comprehensive, psychometrically evaluated measure of PHK is currently lacking. Based on the recently proposed PHK Taxonomy, we developed a comprehensive PHK item pool of approximately 500 knowledge items targeting knowledge about global issues in seven domains: Health, Nutrition, Environment, Safety, Education, Standard of Living, and Political & Economic systems. The item pool was evaluated in seven domain-specific psychometric studies using a balanced-incomplete-block-design, administered to a total of N = 2204 participants. Items suitable for general population samples were selected based on psychometric characteristics. Construct validity was examined via associations with general knowledge (gc), global citizenship identification (GCI), sustainable behavior, educational attainment, subjective knowledge, information seeking frequency, and party affiliation. Across all domains, PHK showed moderate to strong associations with gc (r = .539 − .736) and educational attainment, and weaker associations with GCI (r = .238 − .416). Associations with sustainable behavior, subjective knowledge, and information seeking-frequency were small to negligible. The resulting domain-specific PHK item sets provide psychometrically evaluated PHK measures for assessing PHK in general population samples. Finally, we discuss implications for knowledge assessment and future applications in research and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Rees & Oliver Wilhelm, 2026. "Measuring planetary health knowledge: Development and psychometric evaluation of a taxonomy-based test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359156
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359156
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359156&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0359156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.