Author
Listed:
- William Riciere Pedon
- Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa
- Lorenzo de Ávila Rodrigues Cortizo Vidal
- Pedro Augusto Inacio
- Marcelo Magalhães Sales
- Ivanéria Mendonça Martins
- James Oluwagbamigbe Fajemiroye
- Sergio Machado
- Vicente Aprigliano
- Gabriela Ribeiro Inacio
- Adolfo Mundombe Cameia
- Gaspar R Chiappa
- Eduardo da Matta Mello Portugal
- Alberto Souza Sá Filho
Abstract
Background: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a key mediator of neuroplasticity and has been associated with disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). While aerobic exercise is consistently linked to BDNF modulation, the specific contribution of isolated resistance training (RT) remains unclear, as previous reviews have largely combined multimodal exercise interventions. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of isolated RT on peripheral BDNF levels in individuals with MS (PROSPERO: CRD420251141069). Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, PEDro and Cochrane up to January 10, 2026, using PICOT criteria. Controlled experimental studies investigating isolated RT and BDNF outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied to estimate pooled effects. Results: Four studies (three RCTs and one controlled non-randomized trial), totaling 126 participants with MS, were included. Interventions lasted 8–24 weeks, with training frequencies of 2–3 sessions per week. Meta-analytic synthesis revealed positive pooled effects (SMD = 0.49; 95%CI: 0.15 to 0.83; Z = 2.80; p
Suggested Citation
William Riciere Pedon & Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa & Lorenzo de Ávila Rodrigues Cortizo Vidal & Pedro Augusto Inacio & Marcelo Magalhães Sales & Ivanéria Mendonça Martins & James Oluwagbamigbe Fa, 2026.
"Is resistance training effective to increase BDNF in multiple sclerosis? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated interventions,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0359019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359019
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0359019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.