IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358941.html

Fire risk assessment for high-rise buildings based on Integrated Disaster Risk Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yingda Huang
  • Zonglai Liu
  • Xiaogeng Wei
  • Zhi-Jin Wu

Abstract

High-rise buildings have become a dominant form of urban development. However, because these buildings face multiple fire safety risks, including difficulties in fire suppression, diverse occupancy types, rapid fire spread, and challenging evacuation, once a fire occurs, it is likely to cause serious casualties and significant property losses. It is therefore essential to carry out fire risk assessments for high-rise buildings in advance and to adopt targeted prevention and control measures. To improve the systematic and scenario-specific assessment of fire risk in high-rise buildings, this study introduces the Integrated Disaster Risk Theory into high-rise building fire risk assessment and reconstructs the assessment indicator system according to the specific formation mechanism of high-rise building fires. Indicator weights were integrated using a game-theoretic approach and then combined with cloud model theory to construct a fire risk assessment model for high-rise buildings, thereby identifying the corresponding fire risk levels of high-rise buildings. The assessment results for a typical high-rise building in Changchun showed that its fire risk level was Grade II, indicating a relatively low fire risk. This result was consistent with those obtained using an existing fire risk index method (FRI), thereby supporting the plausibility and consistency of the proposed model. This study provides a more targeted fire risk assessment framework for high-rise buildings, offering methodological support for fire prevention, evacuation management, and emergency rescue resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingda Huang & Zonglai Liu & Xiaogeng Wei & Zhi-Jin Wu, 2026. "Fire risk assessment for high-rise buildings based on Integrated Disaster Risk Theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358941
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358941
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358941&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.