IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358862.html

Older adults’ evaluations of smart home control screen designs: Appearance dimensions and behavioral intentions in a multi-stage study

Author

Listed:
  • Liangming Jia
  • Qisen Zhang
  • Weimin Zhai
  • Zhongzhen Lin
  • Shasha Li

Abstract

In age-friendly home environments, control screens provide a point of contact between users and smart home systems, and their appearance may shape initial evaluations of these systems. This exploratory study used a multi-stage design to investigate older adults’ appearance evaluations and behavioral-intention patterns across different screen designs. Similarity judgments provided by 15 experts were examined using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis, from which eight representative designs were selected from the original pool of 87 samples. Three independent groups of older adults took part, respectively, in dimension construction, comparative appearance evaluation, and behavioral-intention assessment. Exploratory principal component analysis identified four dimensions specific to the present study: Sturdy and Reliable, Futuristic Technology, High Quality, and Simple and Efficient. In the supplementary entropy-weighted TOPSIS analysis, the two largest data-derived weights were assigned to Sturdy and Reliable (31.3%) and Simple and Efficient (28.8%), and S73 ranked first in the composite appearance evaluation. Preference, willingness to use, and willingness to purchase differed across the eight designs in the Friedman tests (all p

Suggested Citation

  • Liangming Jia & Qisen Zhang & Weimin Zhai & Zhongzhen Lin & Shasha Li, 2026. "Older adults’ evaluations of smart home control screen designs: Appearance dimensions and behavioral intentions in a multi-stage study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358862
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358862
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358862&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.