IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358760.html

Alternative digital secondary education for marginalized, out-of-school youth in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a scoping review of intervention models, outcomes, and implementation challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Jefferson Mwaisaka
  • Lilian Agesa
  • Ruth Nanjekho

Abstract

Background: Globally, 272 million children and youth were out of school in 2023, nearly half of whom are of secondary school age. Disparities disproportionately affect girls, displaced populations, and rural communities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Digital technologies are increasingly promoted as alternative pathways to re-engage out-of-school youth in secondary education. However, evidence on intervention models, outcomes, and implementation challenges remains fragmented, with no comprehensive synthesis to inform policy and practice. Objective: This scoping review protocol aims to systematically map the available evidence on intervention models, outcomes, and implementation challenges of alternative digital secondary education for marginalized, out-of-school youth in LMICs. Materials and methods: This review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5SRUD. A comprehensive search will be conducted across education, multidisciplinary, health, and regional databases, supplemented by grey literature from international organizations and preprint repositories. Eligible sources include empirical studies, program evaluations, policy documents, and reviews published from 2010 onwards – with no language restrictions, focusing on alternative digital secondary education for marginalized youth aged 13–24 years in LMICs. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardized form, with a sample verified by a second reviewer. Findings will be synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to identify patterns in intervention models, outcomes, implementation factors, and equity considerations. Conclusion: This review will provide the first comprehensive mapping of alternative digital secondary education for marginalized youth in LMICs, synthesizing fragmented evidence across sectors. Findings will inform evidence-based investments – guiding decisions on low-tech versus high-tech approaches, targeting of underserved populations, and priority areas for future evaluation. All data will be made publicly available on OSF. Protocol OSF Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E8RZ3.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefferson Mwaisaka & Lilian Agesa & Ruth Nanjekho, 2026. "Alternative digital secondary education for marginalized, out-of-school youth in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a scoping review of intervention models, outcomes, and implementation challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358760
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358760&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.