IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358648.html

Pathways to integrated learning outcomes in professional and entrepreneurship education: Evidence from student perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Zhang
  • Khalid Usman
  • Hongmei Yang
  • Qianqian Yan

Abstract

Drawing on the resource-based view, constructivist learning theory, and the theory of planned behavior, this study develops a process-oriented framework conceptualized as “resource input-cognitive construction-behavioral engagement” to examine how integrated learning outcomes in professional and entrepreneurship education are associated with multiple educational factors. Using survey data from 584 university students, the empirical analysis indicates that teaching content, teacher competence, student engagement, and university-enterprise resources are all positively associated with integrated learning outcomes. These associations are primarily reflected through instructional practice effectiveness as a key process variable. In contrast, policy support shows no significant direct association with learning outcomes but appears to be related through indirect pathways. By adopting a process perspective, this study highlights how educational resources, instructional practices, and student engagement jointly relate to learning outcomes in integrated education contexts. The findings offer implications for improving curriculum design, strengthening practice-oriented teaching, enhancing teacher competence, and promoting university enterprise collaboration in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Zhang & Khalid Usman & Hongmei Yang & Qianqian Yan, 2026. "Pathways to integrated learning outcomes in professional and entrepreneurship education: Evidence from student perceptions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358648
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358648
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358648&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.