Author
Listed:
- Nusrat Jahan
- Jannatul Maua
- Uland Rozario
- Hashibul Ahsan Shoaib
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to support managerial decision-making in domains such as human resource management and customer relationship management; however, the lack of transparency in complex predictive models limits their practical adoption. This paper proposes a counterfactual-guided explainable artificial intelligence framework that integrates deep learning, feature attribution, and counterfactual reasoning to deliver accurate, interpretable, and actionable managerial insights. The proposed model is evaluated on an employee attrition dataset and a customer churn dataset, as well as in a combined multi-domain setting. Experimental results show that the framework achieves classification accuracies of up to 91.4% for employee attrition prediction and 87.3% for customer churn prediction, with corresponding ROC–AUC scores reaching 0.869 and 0.891, respectively. The model also demonstrates improved probability calibration, reducing the Brier score to 0.128 on the attrition dataset and 0.109 on the churn dataset. Furthermore, explainability analysis yields higher SHAP fidelity scores exceeding 0.90, while the counterfactual module generates valid and plausible recommendations with lower action costs compared to baseline approaches. These results indicate that the proposed framework effectively bridges predictive performance, interpretability, and actionability, making it suitable for real-world managerial decision-support systems. The framework is formulated as a constraint-aware optimization problem that integrates predictive modeling, explanation fidelity, and cost-sensitive counterfactual generation into a unified objective, enabling actionable and feasible decision support.
Suggested Citation
Nusrat Jahan & Jannatul Maua & Uland Rozario & Hashibul Ahsan Shoaib, 2026.
"An integrated explainable AI framework with counterfactual optimization for decision support,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-29, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0358643
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358643
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.